Using the Least-Cost Estimator
- The first step in using the Least-Cost Estimator is to
identify:
- Month and Year of the LGM-Dairy contract offering to be
analyzed
- Approved target milk marketings (cwt) for each month
- Purchased corn and soybean meal(SBM) equivalents (tons) used in the
production of the above target marketings
- Desired deductible ($/cwt)
If you have used the program before and saved the above data from a previous analysis as
a CSV file (and able to be read by Excel)you can skip to Step
2. Otherwise, enter the above information on the
program's input form. The following shows the pull-down
menus for year and month of contract offering, deductible level, the
options by which the feed equivalents can be added to the database and
the target Net Income Over Feed Cost (NIOFC).
Figure 1: Input Form for Identifying Contract,
Deductible, Feed Entry Method and Target Total Farm Milk Net Income Over
Feed Cost ($/cwt)
- Insurance Contract Month
- The pull-down menu allows you to either choose the upcoming
LGM-Dairy conract offering or to undertake an historical
analysis. Data is available starting with Feb. 2000 for
undertaking such analyses. Remember that according to
insurance rules the earliest coverage can begin is for the
2nd month after the LGM-Dairy contract is purchased (i.e.,
the Insurance Contract Month) and can continue for up to a total
10 months. As an example, if you purchase an LGM-Dairy
contract at the end of October 2011, the insurance period runs from
December 2011 through September 2012. The listing of the
months of data to input are automatically adjusted for the month in
which the contract was purchased.
- Deductible Level
- The deductible level is specified per hundred weight of covered
milk via the pull-down menu shown above. The deductible
range is from $0/cwt to $2.00/cwt of Gross Margin in $0.10
increments. Again as specified by program rules, the
higher the deductible the greater the premium
subsidy. The following table shows the relationship
between deductible level premium subsidy:
Table 1. Deductible and Premium Subsidy
| Deductible ($/cwt) | $0 | $0.10 | $0.20 | $0.30 | $0.40 | $0.50 |
| % Subsidy | 18 | 19 | 21 |
23 | 25 | 28 |
| Deductible ($/cwt) | $0.60 | $0.70 | $0.80
| $0.90 | $1.00 | $1.10-$2.00 |
| % Subsidy | 31 | 34 | 38 |
43 | 48 | 50 |
- Feed Values
-
- There are four methods for entering your feed equivalent values as shown in the above Figure:
- Enter manually
- Use minimum allowable feed
- Use default values
- Use maximum allowable feed
The following provides a brief overview of the methods that can be used to
enter the feed equivalents.
- When you choose the Enter Manually method for feed input you
will supply, for each month covered by an LGM-Dairy contract, an
estimate of the amount of feed equivalents required to produce
the approved target marketings. We have developed a
number of software systems that can be used to convert dairy
feed ingredients to corn and SBM equivalents, one based on the
Penn State Dairy Reference Manual (web version,
spreadsheet)
and a 2nd based on data from the National
Research Council
- By choosing the Lowest Allowed method
for entering feed equivalents the Premium Estimator
will automatically calculate the minimum feed equivalents
allowable under LGM-Dairy for the approved target marketings
you specify. The minimum amounts of corn and SBM
equivalents per cwt of milk are 0.00364 and 0.000805,
respectively.
- When using the Default feed equivalent entry method you are choosing
to use the LGM-Dairy program defined default feed
equivalents. The tons of corn grain and SBM
equivalents per cwt of milk are 0.014 and 0.002,
respectively.
- By choosing the Highest Allowed method
for entering feed equivalents the Premium Estimator
will automatically calculate the maximum feed equivalents
allowable under LGM-Dairy for the approved target marketings
you specify. The maximum amounts of corn and SBM
equivalents per cwt of milk are 0.02912 and 0.006425,
respectively.
- Target
Net Income Over Feed Costs (NIOFC)
-
- In contrast to the Premium Estimator and Options Cost
Estimator, when using the Least-Cost Optimizer, the user does
not specify the LGM-Dairy contract. Instead the user
supplies the allowable target marketings, feed equivalents and
deduductible. The LGM-Dairy Optimizer identifies the
optimal contract design defined as that contract that returns a
target net (of premium) IOFC applied to all allowable target
marketings at least cost. Note that under most
conditions, less than 100% of the allowable target marketings need
to be insured to generate the target/cwt results.
In the
Target NIOFC input cell, specify the
target per cwt of total alloable target marketings (i.e.,
total farm milk)
Dates Used in Premium Estimation
- The year and month chosen determines the type of data used in the estimation of the desired LGM-Dairy contract. For dates other then the current month's LGM-Dairy offering a database of historical data is used for premium determination. If you are estimating contract premiums for the upcoming LGM-Dairy contract offering, then the Premium Estimator will automatically use the most recent 3 days of futures and options data for in premium determination. If you are estimating premiums for an upcoming offering the following is displayed below the window where you defing your feed input method. In this example we are estimating the premium costs for coverage under the June 2011 contract offering. This analysis was undertaken on June 2nd.
Figure 2: Dates of Data Used When Estimating June 2011 Contract Offering Premiums on June 2nd
- Entering Milk Production and Feed Equivalent Data
- With the identification of the potential coverage months,
deductible, method of feed entry and target NIOFC, the user can
now enter the approved target marketings (i.e., milk production)
and estimated feed equivalents. Figure 3 shows the
input form assuming you are entering the feed equivalents
manually:
Figure 3: Least Cost Optimizaer
Input Form Used to Enter Allowable Target Marketings and Feed
Equivalents The table cells in yellow
require the user to input the associated data values. In this
example we are
assuming that the manual method is used to enter the feed equivalent
information. The first column identifies the monthly approved
target marketings. The next two columns of input are the
estimated total amount of corn and SBM equivlents required to produce
the approved target marketings. The last row of this input
form is used to provide a summary of total marketings and total feed
equivalents used.
- If you already have the saved data from a previous run, simply click the
Upload button located above the general input
form. You use the typical file manager to browse to the
location where the desired CSV input file is located.
- Once you click on the Optimize Coverages for Least Cost
Premium shown in the bottom of Figure 3, you obtain:
- The optimal (li.e., lowest net premium cost) contract design
- The associated monthly gross margins and total GMG both on a total
and a $/cwt basis.
Figure 4 shows the optimal (least cost) contract design that minimizes
the total cost of generating $6.50/cwt NIOFC for total farm marketings.
In the example shown in Figure 4, only 73.4% of total allowable marketings
are required to be insured to generate the above target NIOFC. 100% of the
target marketings for Aug 2011 - Jan 2012 and May 2012 are insured.
Figure 4: Optimial (Least Cost)
Contract Design
Once you have identified the optimal (least cost) LGM-Dairy contract, you
can then use the Premium Estimator to estimate the
contracts premiums and undertake a sensitivity analysis under alternative
deductible levels you can select the Calculate LGM
Premium button shown at the bottom of Figure 4. To
obtain an overview of the Premium Estimator refer to
the associated Premium Estimator help system.
- Figure 5 is used to show the Summary portion of the
Results section of the program. Both
total and per cwt results are shown with
respect to net (of subsidy) premium, GMG and net (of net
premium)GMG. Note that with a premium of $0.26 per cwt of farm
milk the $6.76/cwt GMG shown in Figure 4 returns the target NIOFC of
$6.50
Figure 5: Summary of Results For
Premium Determination of the Least Cost Contract Configuration